Everything you need to know to begin your journey in understanding the foundations of a working legal systems and understanding what to do when things are unfair — and what the courts, and the Crown, say about your rights.
Latin Legal Terms in Plain Words NZ | Working for Workers

Latin Legal Terms, In Plain Words

The Latin a worker and an advocate actually meet — natural justice, good faith, precedent, proof, powers, and remedies — set out plainly, with the New Zealand statutory references current to the 29th of June 2026.

In short. Latin is the oldest trick in the law for making a simple thing sound unanswerable. None of these terms is difficult once it is said in plain words, and a decision made about you should never turn on language you were not meant to follow. The duty of good faith in section 4 of the Employment Relations Act 2000 is meant to be active, constructive, and communicative; jargon used to shut a worker out runs against the whole spirit of it. This is a working glossary of the Latin you will actually meet, grouped by the job it does.

How to read this guide

The terms below are the ones that turn up in employment decisions, in Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC) reviews, in the determinations of the Employment Relations Authority, and in the rules of an incorporated society. It is deliberately not a complete dictionary of legal Latin — the ecclesiastical and old civil-law terms that fill the longer lists almost never appear in a New Zealand statutory dispute, so they are left out. Each entry gives the literal translation and then what the term actually does when it is used against you or for you. Where a term connects to a fuller treatment elsewhere in the hub, the entry links to it.

Fairness and natural justice

These are the maxims that carry the principles of a fair hearing. They sit underneath every other article in this hub, and two of them have their own dedicated pages.

TermLiterallyIn practice
audi alteram partemhear the other sideThe decision-maker must hear you before deciding against you. You are entitled to know the case and to answer it. This is the principle behind The Right to Be Heard.
nemo iudex in causa suano one a judge in their own causeNo one may decide a matter in which they have an interest or a closed mind. The bias need only be apparent, not proven actual. This is the principle behind The Rule Against Bias.
ubi jus ibi remediumwhere there is a right, there is a remedyIf the law gives you a right, it must also give you a way to enforce it. A right with no remedy is not a right at all.
contra proferentemagainst the one putting it forwardAn ambiguous term in an agreement is read against the party who drafted it. In an employment agreement, that is usually the employer.
de minimis non curat lexthe law does not concern itself with triflesThe law will not act on something genuinely trivial. Often invoked by the stronger party to dismiss a complaint — the question is always whether the thing really is trivial, or only said to be.
ex partefrom one sideA step taken with only one party present. Sometimes necessary and urgent, but a decision reached entirely ex parte sits in tension with the right to be heard.

Good faith and obligation

The language of promises, dealing, and bargaining. Good faith is not a Latin import — it is written into section 4 of the Employment Relations Act 2000 in plain English — but its Latin relatives still appear constantly.

TermLiterallyIn practice
bona fidein good faithSincerely, honestly, without a hidden agenda. A bona fide redundancy is a genuine one; a redundancy that is really a disguised dismissal is not.
mala fidein bad faithThe opposite. Acting dishonestly or for an improper purpose while dressing it up as something proper.
uberrima fidesutmost good faithA heightened duty of complete candour, classically in insurance. Relevant where one side holds all the information and the other must rely on it.
ex gratiaas a favourA payment or act offered voluntarily, with no admission of liability. An ex gratia offer is not the same as recognising you were owed something.
quid pro quothis for thatAn exchange of one thing for another. In a harassment context, a demand that something be given in return for keeping a job or an entitlement.
consensus ad idemagreement to the same thingA genuine meeting of minds. Without it, there is no real agreement, however many signatures sit on the page.
nudum pactuma bare promiseA promise with nothing given for it, and so generally unenforceable as a contract. A promise of a benefit you gave nothing up for may be a nudum pactum.

How decisions and precedent work

The vocabulary of how a ruling is built and how far it binds. The most important entry here for a worker is de novo, because it names the actual route to challenge a determination of the Employment Relations Authority.

TermLiterallyIn practice
de novoanewHeard afresh, from the start. The route to challenge a determination of the Employment Relations Authority is a hearing de novo in the Employment Court under section 179 of the Employment Relations Act 2000 — not judicial review. See What Judicial Review Actually Is for the difference.
ratio decidendithe reason for the decisionThe part of a judgment that actually binds: the legal reasoning essential to the result. When a case is cited at you, the ratio is what counts.
obiter dictumsaid in passingA remark in a judgment that was not essential to the decision. Persuasive, but it does not bind. Often quoted as if it did.
stare decisisto stand by things decidedThe principle that like cases are decided alike and lower bodies follow higher courts. It is what makes precedent more than opinion.
per curiamby the courtA decision given by the court as a whole, with no single author named.
res judicataa matter already judgedA matter finally decided between the same parties cannot be litigated again. It protects a result; it does not protect a wrong process from challenge by the proper route.
functus officiohaving discharged its officeA decision-maker whose task is finished and who has no power left to revisit it. Useful when a body tries to reopen something it has already concluded.
sub judiceunder judicial considerationA matter currently before a court or tribunal, and so not to be prejudged or publicly pronounced upon as if already decided.

Proof, evidence, and standing

The terms that decide who has to prove what, and who is even allowed to be heard. These connect to Standards of Proof and Statements, Facts and the Weight of Evidence.

TermLiterallyIn practice
prima facieon its faceEnough, on first sight, to be taken as established unless answered. A prima facie case shifts the conversation to the other side to respond.
onus probandithe burden of proofWho must prove the point. In a personal grievance the employer must justify what it did; the worker does not have to prove the dismissal was unjustified.
locus standiplace of standingThe right to bring or be heard in a matter — whether you are a proper party at all. A threshold question raised to keep someone out.
res ipsa loquiturthe thing speaks for itselfWhere harm of a kind that does not normally happen without fault has happened, fault may be inferred from the event itself.
in limineat the thresholdA preliminary point dealt with before the substance, often an attempt to exclude evidence or end the matter early.
ore tenusby word of mouthEvidence or argument given orally rather than in writing.

Powers and their limits

The language of authority: whether a body had the power to do what it did, and what to do when it did not. This is the territory of the incorporated society acting outside its rules, and of the public body exceeding its statutory power.

TermLiterallyIn practice
ultra viresbeyond the powersAn act done without the legal power to do it — a committee acting outside its constitution, or a body exceeding its statute. An ultra vires act can be struck down.
intra vireswithin the powersThe opposite: an act properly within the authority granted.
ab initiofrom the beginningFrom the very start. Something void ab initio never had legal effect at all, as opposed to being undone later.
ex facieon the face of itApparent from the document itself, without needing further argument — as where an error is obvious on the face of a decision.
mandamuswe commandA court order compelling a public body to perform a duty it is required to perform.
quo warrantoby what authorityA challenge demanding that a person show the legal right by which they hold an office or exercise a power.

Remedies and putting things right

What happens after a wrong is found: how loss is measured and how a position is restored.

TermLiterallyIn practice
restitutio in integrumrestoration to the wholePutting a person back in the position they were in before the wrong, so far as money or reinstatement can.
pro ratain proportionCalculated proportionally — a part-period of leave or pay worked out by the share of time involved.
pari passuon equal footingRanking equally, without one being preferred over another — for example, creditors paid in equal proportion.
ex nuncfrom nowTaking effect only from this point forward, not backwards.
ex tuncfrom thenTaking effect from the original time, as though the position had always been so.
mutatis mutandiswith the necessary changes madeApply this the same way, changing only the details that obviously need changing. Common when one clause borrows another.

The Latin you meet on the page

Finally, the shorthand that fills judgments, determinations, and submissions. None of it is doing anything clever — it is just abbreviation, and knowing it lets you read a decision at full speed.

TermLiterallyIn practice
inter aliaamong other thingsSignals the list is not complete — this is one item drawn from more.
et al.and othersStands in for the rest of a list of people or parties.
et seq.and the followingThe cited page or section and those that follow it.
viz.namelyIntroduces a precise specification of what was just mentioned.
sicthusMarks that an error in a quotation is in the original, not a slip in the copying.
ibid.in the same placeRefers to the source cited immediately before.
supra / infraabove / belowPoints the reader to something earlier (supra) or later (infra) in the same document.
cf.compareInvites a comparison, often with a source that points the other way.
per sein itselfBy its very nature, considered on its own.
ad hocfor thisMade up for the particular occasion, not following any general rule.
pro temfor the time beingTemporary; holding a position or arrangement only until a permanent one is settled.
sui generisof its own kindUnique; not fitting any existing category, and so judged on its own terms.

The point of all of it

  • Every term here has a plain meaning. If it is being used to make you feel that a decision is beyond questioning, that is the use, not the meaning.
  • The route to challenge a determination of the Employment Relations Authority is a hearing de novo in the Employment Court under section 179 of the Employment Relations Act 2000.
  • Good faith under section 4 of the Employment Relations Act 2000 requires being open and communicative — the opposite of hiding behind language.

Legislation cited is linked to the current consolidated text on the New Zealand Parliamentary Counsel Office website at legislation.govt.nz. This guide is a plain-language reference compiled by Working for Workers; literal translations are given for orientation only, and no entry is a substitute for advice on how a term applies to your own situation.

Faced with a decision dressed up in language you were never meant to follow?

It does not matter who is making the decision — an employer, the Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC), an incorporated society, a tribunal, or any public body exercising a statutory power. If the process used against you is unfair, the Latin does not change that, and it should never be the reason you feel you cannot push back.

  • A disciplinary or dismissal decision justified in language you were never given a fair chance to understand
  • An Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC) decision declining, suspending, or reviewing your cover or entitlements
  • A committee or tribunal that has decided something about you from behind a wall of procedure
  • An incorporated society invoking its rules or constitution to shut down your voice
  • A determination of the Employment Relations Authority you have been told you must simply accept
  • Any public body exercising a statutory power whose reasons you cannot follow

Working for Workers stands up for people facing unfair and unreasonable process, across four areas of practice:

Fairness in Law  ·  Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC) Law  ·  Employment Law  ·  Incorporated Societies Evaluation

Whatever the decision-maker, if you are up against an unfair or biased process, get in touch and we will help you work out where you stand.

← Back to Fairness In Law And Advice Hub
← Previous The Emperor's New Algorithm The legal profession's panic over Artificial Intelligence, against what the courts and the Authority actually require. More in this hub → Fairness In Law And Advice Hub Browse the rest of the fairness and natural-justice articles.